05 — Redesign · Nonprofit

World Vision — Child Selector Widget

RoleUX Designer ClientWorld Vision Australia AgencySleevesUp MethodRedesign + A/B Test
World Vision — child selector widget redesign
worldvision-hero.jpg — before/after widget or final redesigned screens
72%
Conversion rate increase — A/B tested and statistically significant
4.3% (variant) vs 2.5% (control) on mobile child sponsorship widget · World Vision Australia

When a small widget carries enormous weight

The child selector widget is the centrepiece of World Vision Australia's child sponsorship flow — the moment a potential sponsor browses available children, selects one, and begins a relationship that can last years. It's emotionally significant, commercially critical, and at the time, failing on mobile.

Via SleevesUp, I was engaged to diagnose the conversion problem and redesign the widget for mobile-first performance — with the outcome validated through a properly structured A/B test.

Conversion Optimisation A/B Testing Mobile-First Design Nonprofit CRO SleevesUp

A desktop pattern stranded on mobile

The existing child selector was designed for desktop — a grid-based browsing interface with multiple filter options, small profile images, and dense text. On mobile, this translated to a cramped, hard-to-interact-with experience that required significant scrolling and precise tapping to navigate.

For a moment that is inherently emotional — choosing a child to sponsor — the experience was doing the opposite of what it needed to do. Instead of facilitating connection, it was creating friction.

"The original widget was a grid layout that worked fine at 1200px wide. At 375px — where the majority of World Vision's mobile traffic was — it was a mess."

What changed — and why

01

Card-first navigation, not grid browsing

Replaced the multi-column grid with a swipeable card format on mobile. One child at a time, full-focus. This matched the mental model of a significant personal choice — you don't speed-browse a child to sponsor the way you browse a product catalogue.

02

Larger, high-quality imagery

The original widget used thumbnail-size images. The redesign used full-width imagery that occupied most of the card — making the emotional connection more immediate. Images were also optimised for mobile load performance.

03

Progressive disclosure of details

Child details (name, age, country, interests) were shown in layers — essential info visible immediately, deeper profile accessible on tap. This reduced visual overload on initial view without removing the personal detail that drives connection.

04

Simplified filter interaction

Replaced the desktop-style multi-filter panel with mobile-appropriate filter chips — one row, horizontally scrollable. Most users only filtered by one dimension (country or gender); the redesign optimised for that case while preserving access to the rest.

05

Clear, persistent CTA

The sponsor button in the original widget was positioned below a variable amount of content — on some cards it was visible, on others it required scrolling. The redesign fixed the CTA at the bottom of the card, always visible, always reachable.

World Vision — before and after comparison
worldvision-compare.jpg — before & after widget comparison

Validation through controlled experiment

The redesigned widget was tested against the original in a properly structured A/B test on World Vision Australia's live website — equal traffic split, sufficient sample size for statistical significance, conversion (sponsor button click → form completion) as the primary metric.

Control — Original Widget
2.5%
Conversion rate on mobile traffic · multi-column grid layout
Variant — Redesigned Widget
4.3%
Conversion rate on mobile traffic · card-first layout

The 4.3% vs 2.5% conversion difference represents a 72% relative improvement. For a donation-driven organisation, this kind of uplift translates directly into more children sponsored — not a UX metric, a mission metric.

Design as mission-critical infrastructure

This project reinforced something I believe firmly: in nonprofit digital — and anywhere there's a high-stakes conversion moment — the quality of the design is not aesthetic, it's operational. A 1% improvement in child sponsorship conversion means more children supported. The stakes make the craft matter differently.

The A/B test process was also a reminder of why validation matters. The design decisions seemed obvious in hindsight. Before the test, they were educated bets. The test converted them into evidence.

← ANZ Research Next Project Crown Resorts →